Invite For 25th Birthday

And what I hate most is that I always travel with this company, because financially they rival, and currently I am not rich enough to afford tickets 4 times expensive. That is my conviction.

my blood boil to carry a bag costs more than I or the d ifference there when you get the fare at first, with the final price is.

Even at the airport check in charge you did not know that the paper and ink were so expensive.

is until you pay by credit card charge! What do you expect O'Leary, come to your house to pay in cash?

And that leaves the issue of owner, how many more we have to put up with nonsense?.

Among

the lindeces, to eliminate the co-pilot, due to the automation of aircraft. I hope it goes on a plane without passenger and the driver becomes unconscious for the nonsense that has endured. "The plane would land him? In any case, one driver suggested that if they wanted to save, which would replace O'Leary by a flight attendant trainees, which only charges € 13,200 a year.

Another genius, of bringing people standing on the aircraft. And in takeoffs and landings are we doing? Are we tied to sticks? And while I stick by it a little more fun.

We

with the ideas of this genius, which also proposed charge for using the bathroom. Really is an expense that a person uses a toilet? Are sometimes used for cleaning or something? This guy is able to charge to the crew.

even proposed to charge less handsome. I think this is discussed by itself.

Perhaps I am, I have little sense of humor, or perhaps that between foolishness and nonsense, is getting us bent.

Mr. Hate: ^ P

Saying To Put In Going Away Card

Live music reviews

says Chomsky ( About Anarchism, pp. 122-123):

A system of indoctrination that function properly must fulfill various tasks, some quite delicate. One of his goals are stupid and ignorant masses. Shall be maintained in this state, distracted with gross simplifications and great emotional strength, marginalized and isolated. Ideally, each person should be alone in front of the television screen, watching sports, soap operas or comedies, deprived of organizational structures that allow individuals lacking resources to discover what are your thoughts and beliefs in interaction with others, to formulate their own concerns and plans and act to achieve them. Arriving this situation be allowed to ratify decisions made by those who are better than them in regular elections, and to encourage them to do so.

This observation is so obvious that too many comments. The zeal of politicians, media and personalities that the people go to the polls at election time is used to create the illusion of democracy, the illusion that we choose and also this is how you (the system) that is.

The "despicable crowd" is the appropriate target media and a public education system aimed at generating obedience and training in the skills required, including repeating patriotic slogans on timely occasions.

Greased and ready to sit at the machine, so we left the universities and training schools. Talking about public opinion means to speak of the currents of opinion are more or less spontaneously creating, producing, manufacturing (using the term that Chomsky himself uses *) media. It is these who decide what should be discussed, from what approaches and for what purposes. This is particularly serious given the fact that these media conglomerates are just private interests and are not work the search for truth. The theme of patriotic slogans, on the other hand, is more effective than it seems. Every so often there is a ferment of exaltation or merely patriotic identity that reinforce the subordination to the state. Any excuse is valid, the incident Parsley, the discussion of "His Majesty King Don Juan Carlos I" (what century are we?) With the "banana dictator" sporting events such as the recent World Cup, etc. The latter case is paradigmatic, the next morning saw the celebrations flags on the ground, is no longer played patriotic show had to go back to the routine indifference.

story would come to browse these links, where Chomsky extends the analysis of this case:

- propaganda model of media .
- Consensus manufactured.

I still have the book:

The problem of indoctrination is a bit different for those who are expected to participate in making serious decisions and the exercise of control: corporate managers, state and culture and cultured sectors in general. These people must internalize the values \u200b\u200bof the system and share the necessary illusions allowing operation in the interests of those who concentrate in their hands the power and privileges. But they also have some understanding of the realities of the world, otherwise it will not be able to perform their tasks effectively. The elite media and education systems must find ways to resolve these dilemmas, which is not easy work. It is interesting to see in detail how to carry out such work, but it is something that falls outside the limits of these observations.

This really crucial aspect in the intellectual underpinning of the system requires more attention to be appreciated. The explanation for the broadcast of messages more or less anti- or protest, showing realities problematic for the regime and to show some of its major contradictions from media system itself is explained as follows. Far from creating a current antagonist, creates an appearance that the system is concerned, there is criticism and that mistakes are a result of this is not implemented what it should. We all know La 2 English TV, where content often have a place like this ( voices against globalization, TV Documents, etc.) Or can also be given the emphasis that report cases of corruption in political caste. This is how the system actually is underpinned, any solution is to participate in it ...

clearly saw Aldous Huxley (Brave New World , Prologue) :

A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all powerful political bosses and their army of collaborators could govern a population of slaves on which was not necessary since any coercion would love their servitude. Induce them to love it is the task from the current totalitarian state ministries of propaganda, newspaper editors and schoolteachers.

Invitation To Friends For Lohri

chains bye

low to buy bread. I hear a vehicle broadcasting a recording that calls for general strike and regrets the loss of social dialogue, collective bargaining and other ultra-radical strategies ...

The finding of disaster ensues when they heard I was alternating the propaganda with the Killers singing huuuuuman Are we or are we daaaanceers ... Sure, you have to win the youth, is to sound modern, we must know how to sell.

Lords, but the left has died completely and utterly.

I wonder if I'll see a limousine with propaganda of the employers and Viva la vida Coldplay as the soundtrack ...

To avoid wasting an entire entry with nonsense and pathos, put something worthwhile and I just remember seeing that scene so violent ...

Unemployment is not the enemy, the enemy is at work. (*) (Madrid Surrealist Group)

One of the worst effects of the economic crisis now raging in the capitalist world is the ultimate deification of labor as the highest good, as the absolute ideal, as I want maximum , as the ultimate cause of happiness. The work is scarcer as a means to ensure daily survival, it is most identified with a metaphysical view of human consciousness. The result of this operation is none other than mental the paralysis of will, thought and imagination of the social body, which shocked by the religious connotations that has covered the act of the gain or loss of work (or grace eternal damnation) is not able to invent or intuit want another order of things in which this anxiety simply do not exist.

In other words, the forced leisure of the unemployed could become leisure rescued if the approach, rather than "I find work today?" Became "What I want to do today?" Considering those goods materials you need, not as something forbidden, but as something that belongs to justice under the condition human being, nay, human being humiliated. Criminal conduct if the action of individuals or a few, revolutionary action if shared by the majority.

The focus moves from work and life, and one negates the other. The prestige of the work should start to be absolute, and with it the ethic of sacrifice, slavery, obedience and servitude. The motto is: "NEVER WORK!" And its immediate implementation, "IN THESE TERMS, EVEN LESS!"

Thus, labor objectors armies occupying the streets and dreams, improvised new behaviors and new relationships social, pose a threat more frightening than any strike.

(*) Leaflet-detornación an unemployment card, divided into the "general strike" of 1993.