Thursday, November 25, 2010

Men Public Urinal Masterbation

SdT



"When you criticize the secondary and is silent on the cardinal, the latter acquires a mark of validity and admissibility that had not therefore had naively admitted to not being censored at a time when the prevailing vituperation, is that nature is positive. " [1]

criticism, however successful it may be, to the inessential, entails an affirmation of the essential.
Take, for example, the case of a tree. Is not adequate to its roots as it considers erroneous training, composition, orientation, the land on which it sits and project the external body or any other consideration, it will seem secondary and even counterproductive to the struggle of those who want change leaves, the struggle of those who want to decorate it with ornaments best for Christmas, struggle of those who want to cut some branches that disrupt the assembly, or toss the dried buds. The struggle, too, of those extremists, they want to put a stick into the stem to force in one direction.

who disagrees with the roots you can see good intentions in these struggles, you can see a salutary effect on his conquests, but the detailed analysis that led him to realize how wrong they are the roots will produce a certain feeling of frustrating to see so much wasted potential reforms.

Birds that govern the tree and see you only have to reform certain branches of the same will agree with those who say their biggest critics, his greatest antagonist, because none of them see no objection to the roots. These commonplace [2] make the first share (reactionaries) and second ("revolutionary") are for all practical purposes the same body system holder. Those birds

stubborn to talk about roots will be branded as radicals scornfully, when that is precisely its greatest strength [3].

As I come here not to speak of Dendrology, let's see, continuing the theme of stasis [4], some of the many individual cases where this occurs.

- criticism in the markets, as autonomous entities guilty of everything bad. This criticism States forgets, forgets that it is they who give support to those who make markets, they forget that without their legal they would not hold, forget the meager participation of States in the markets themselves. Forgotten, simply that States operate in the same securities markets operate (self-interest, competition, struggle for power, the abrogation of the profound freedom of man).

" has to be challenged the belief that state and market are realities of others or, worse, confronted, as the capitalist private property and the market had not been established beyond a point and completely secured to prevail without the decisive action of the state, removing the coercive institutions with remarkable effectiveness, as demanded Jovellanos (senior official of the old regime declared "worthy of the Fatherland" by the courts of Cadiz) in their crucial " Report on file Agrarian Law "of 1795, the many and formidable" hindrance "of its development. If the State had not performed this task, capitalism would remain true today scattered and discontinuous, weak and unstable, incapable of moving beyond a point. " " It is nonsense to expect the State to go against the market as tantamount to going against himself, in the same manner and to the same extent that it is confident that the development of "free" market will help to alleviate the resulting surplus and harmfulness of the act of the State. "

- in the rejection of capitalism without accounting for its main supporter, the authority and historical metamorphosis to the present state form. Without it there would prospered capitalist property.

" introducing capitalism as a reality outside and distinct from state device (or to argue that this is a mere servant of the former, which is expressed in the unfortunate wording" State capitalist "), is ignored, besides the foregoing, one of the decisive features of the present social formation, the more core interests of states, which manifest themselves in strategic industries, those that are essential to achieve what the Orthodox parlance is called "national security". Going further inquiry is concluded that not only are strategic such and such factories, but the essence of all economic activity. "

" (...) Even more serious is the mistake of those who seek to implement an "anti-capitalism" statist (and usually estatolátrico) which is regard as crucial: that the state agency promotes capitalist economy to make more effective the strategic interests of domination at the global maximum. Whether in peacetime as in wartime, in the context of the ongoing struggle between the various states worldwide, to achieve more and more fields of political, cultural, linguistic or propaganda, commercial, financial, demographic and of course, military. From this it concludes that the hope that the state "limits" or "directs" capitalism is only a delusion of the mind, as the state rule will be greater and more stable, more robust the mode of production that will provide funds, technical equipment and weapons in our time the capitalist. This approach is supported by the indubitable historical fact, as stated, that everywhere was the army, which is the substance of the state apparatus [5] , the main power broker who promotes liberal revolution of capitalism. "

- In the dogmatic assumption of definitions and theories provided by the power and academic class at your service. Consider the current regime as a democracy is the paradigmatic case of this. Democracy is government of the governed to themselves, self-organization and culture of freedom of conscience. We can not talk about freedom of conscience in a permanent regime of indoctrination. Do see the contradictions of the system is fundamental in their criticism, and here his critics who claim officers share common places with him. Any discussion on that basis is, therefore, void.

Holder today one of the news of rebellion , digital flagship alternative general information, setting out a few words of a leading CC.OO. that interview: "Without the struggles of the labor movement today would not have democracy" . [6] Let us flee from those

platitudes cutters all critical discourse and fundamental pillars of the current indoctrination.



Notes 1. democracy and the triumph of State, Felix Rodrigo Mora, pg. 254. The following quotes are taken from the same book, Chapter Power and authority: the political and economic .

2. According to Wikipedia: The cliché is a word, phrase or idea considered as a language service for being too able or excessive use or worn. Presents one or more of the following characteristics:
  • shows little imagination of whom expressed. Replaces the search for original or creative ideas from other already spent. Evidence
  • be copied or stolen from someone else's idea.
  • often used in political discourse as a tool of demagoguery to deceive or disguise the truth.
  • Simplifies an idea or concept that might deserve to be qualified.
also Common Places is the title of a film Adolfo Aristarain (director of which I spoke here ), take the opportunity to recommend.

3. According to Wikipedia: The term radical comes from the Latin radix ('root'), so that means 'root' or 'base', referring primarily to a point of view deep, substantial, especially if applied to any belief, practice, analysis or proposal.

not confuse it, then, with irrational positions that lead to intolerance, dogmatism, intransigence and depersonalization (Extremism, fanaticism, orthodoxies, etc.).

4. http://sosiegas.blogspot.com/2010/11/estatismo-religion-politica.html

5. To view the full present this fact, I recommend seeing this text: http://elgritoinfinito.blogspot.com/2010/10/tomo-este-concepto-del-ya-celebre-entre.html

6 . http://www.rebelion.org/noticias/cultura/2010/11/sin-las-luchas-del-movimiento-sindical-hoy-no-habria-democracia-117368

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Marie Stuart Masterson Nuda

Common Places: The Myth of Statism

By Nacho Martín.

Many have accepted the principles of market economy: competitiveness, desire to eat and look forward to continuing to increase our material welfare. Then we want more than is logical. We made our principles of neoclassical economics: We value the individual versus the social, competition versus cooperation and expansion against stability. Often hastily abandoned native values, and accept these new principles, or on its own conviction, or after some time coexist with a market offering, in varied colors, textures and flavors, everything imaginable and unimaginable.


However, John Gowdy, an anthropologist, an economist and professor of social sciences and humanities, writes Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gathers a very different view. This man, interested in ecological economics, argues that the market is a myth. It is a myth because the values \u200b\u200bunderlying the neoclassical economics are universal values, such that discipline claims, but cultural and relative. The principles underlying the economy are not attributable to the human race per se, but to a particular culture and historical moment. In this sense, these assumptions (individualism, competition, expansion) could be false, and the idea of \u200b\u200b"economic man" is a myth.

In particular, the need to save to get real, if rare, is a cultural construction. Other cultures (Gowdy speaking hunter-gatherers, who still do not practice agriculture and directly from nature) maintain a balance between what you have and what they need, and seem to want some more. By contrast, we as consumers seem addicted to a continuous flow of goods that never seems to satisfy.

Likewise, the idea of \u200b\u200ba single productive activity that occupies most of our time is beyond the Hadza, as another example. They seem, through community activities, reduce their working time to three hours a day, devoting the rest to social exchanges, dances and other recreational activities that we would consider.

In contrast to our culture, the idea of \u200b\u200bredistribution is also widespread among hunter-gatherers, where the hunted animals are distributed to all without seeming important who or what killed it, weakening the concept of property so inherent to our culture.

Finally, most hunter-gatherer societies were "aggressively egalitarian" by limiting the power and individual authority. The existence of inequalities could be a result of our beliefs, rather than an inherent quality of human societies.

All this goes to show that the principles of market economy is a belief, rather than describing one immutable law of nature. It is therefore a matter of judging our society based on their results, and given the multiple disasters generated climate change, mass extinctions of plants and animals, overpopulation, deforestation, acidification ocean pollution and others, these results seem questionable. Other cultures that are not based only on the myth of the market are possible and perhaps increasingly necessary.


Saturday, November 6, 2010

How To Patch Rip In A Leather Couch Seam

market: political religion

"Today it commands a view of capitalism is unrealistic, which leads directly to the glorification of what exists. It ignores the State, no less, and we are exhorted to "fight" against capitalism but neglecting the state agency, presented by many even as an "ally" of the popular classes. All this has manifested itself in the last HG, in which the apology welfare state has been the most substantial part of the program of party and union organizers, with some exceptions. " [1]

Looking at Google Reader new in the websites that I follow, I find a Rebellion article called State and statism. The name of the text, which seems to address a topic (statism) that often echo less in this web, very interested in making a counter-offensive to defend liberal interventionism, so I find it interesting and decided to read it.

I feel, immediately afterwards, with an ode to the achievements of social interventions. The article begins well:

The state, understood as the broader human association and complex history, and statism, seeking the preeminence of the State including in activities that could be met by private initiative, are analyzed antagonistic . For many, statism has had in Stalinism and Hitlerism two extreme expressions, which, in its updated version, they would realize the nightmare of "Big Brother" of Orwell, who reads our thoughts and watching us 24 hours day. For others, the State should be the policeman again stand in the realm of unregulated bankers, through their financial havens, multimillion-dollar business deal in drugs and arms trafficking and continue to cause environmental pollution, such as Fidel Castro said, threatens to turn the planet into steppe smoking, wrapped in toxic clouds.

Well, the remnants of Stalinism and Hitlerism are beginning to be oppressive, stifling any debate ever end. The State today I would say that is far more powerful, since it requires neither monitor nor repressed to keep the subjects in his army safely [2]. And not only that statism has become the official religion. On the one hand, those who need it but not like to ensure their systems domination and privileged positions, and secondly, those who need it but not like to make them against the first and do the same as them, but on behalf of worthy public service. The cynical last sentence, in which Fidel Castro quote (that great statesman, statist ) is explaining the blindness they have. But is it perhaps that the States do not use the monetary system and speculation for their purposes, is that they not handle multimillion-dollar business in arms and drugs, may not go down the same path of turning the planet into steppe smoking? This blindness is confirmed later in the article itself, when the author was pleased that holdings of resources and energy to pass from private to state hands so that everything remains the same, instead of considering a solution to the suicide system.
left Is this radical?

clearly within the scope reformist short term, few adjectives possibilistic and we might occur, the state has solved immediate problems (which he was responsible for creating many of the time) to many people. I think education, social gains, the welfare state and all that. But please, a little depth in the analysis will suffice to see that it has always been at the expense of damage much higher. That education is used by the state in creating academic elites who spread the speech system to create armies of employees and gregarious ideological, social achievements that underpin further socio-economic model to make it more beautifully restored and invalidate any radical critique of same, that nationalizations continue the model operator and ecocide capitalist private enterprise, which creates political nationalism parliamentary dictatorship [3], desecrate the real meaning of democracy, and many etcetera.

In consequence, in order, welcomed the quoted text ... You have to fuck.


[1] Intervention in the debate on the general strike of 29-S .

[2] In this regard I recommend reading a strip illustrated that compared us to the fears of George Orwell and Aldous Huxley, in which we can see that the second prophecy totally what we live today, which does not prevent the other hand see that if The things got ugly, the state could become what Orwell predicted. It's a matter of tactics.
- Strip in english with all the drawings .
- Annotated in Castilian.

[3] On parliamentarism as a system of domination, I highly recommend both the conference audio and text Felix Rodrigo Mora homonyms.

Thursday, November 4, 2010

Congratulations Wording Wedding

hate not knowing what will happen ... I hate working without pay

Well good, finally got the first collaboration to the blog, I hope it is the first in a long list. : ^ P

And it is a complicated situation, it's time that I will finish the race. A few years ago were a privileged But now?

have a generation 0 on the one hand, the generation ni-ni by other ... And you feel you've been forming you for five years now will not avail.

also binds to this situation, what do I do? Well no idea, because during the race I played many clubs but so bad that I have not the faintest idea or what I like or what I like. Which is another problem, it's time to choose the practices and given the situation, do less to choose a company where the best of cases can after hire.

If after practice (of course unpaid) you back where you were, now you ask any business experience and a good level of English least there, to the front.

If anyone knows how to get out of a race with these requirements and, going back to before, knowing what you want to tell me.

This is my situation and that of the majority of the students, what can we do?

How Do I Unlock My Nketgear Wifi

SdT: Warning of bad weather

By Miquel Amoros. Presentation of "coups and counter" in the II Mostra del Llibre Barcelona Anarchist at the Ateneo Libertarian Besos, June 14, 2006.

The intention behind my writing for the debate has been to point out the significant social changes and transformations occurring in the last twenty years, in order to promote the approach of coherent action against oppression, ie developing a strategic thinking. For about twenty years been making world history to gross, and yet we learn.

We lack concepts that capture what happened. The old ideologies have exhausted its possibilities as a tool for interpretation and guidance. Occurs as with all things subject to aging and pollution: they lose strength and reliability and ambiguity in them happens to occupy the place of authenticity. The news is however, a pale simulacrum of the above: environmentalism, city, negrismo, insurrectionalism ... reflecting the extreme degradation of the protest and the ideas that accompany it.

separation between individuals and the results of their work has not stopped growing, and through technological development has gone from being a sign of slavery material to be enslaving the disaster. As the main feature of this society is their immersion in technology. All others are a result: economic globalization, the commodification of life in all its aspects, the absolute social control, the expansion of transport and communications, the ruin of cities, destruction of the territory, the emergence of the masses, the political totalitarianism.

The ruling class is suffering from the changes and evolves into a vertical executive caste, almost invisible and extremely mobile. The rest of the class dissolves into an amorphous conglomeration, with no identity or self-consciousness, the masses. The masses constitute a historical subject, are just the dump of all kinds. Impulse or act in accordance with guidelines from the outside. Mass movements may even build bodies of direct democracy such as assemblies and coordinators, but do not know to use them properly, often used for purposes contrary. They are unable to grasp the absolute nature of the contradiction between their dispossession and grabbing the decision makers. Under these conditions, antagonism repressed conflicts that lead continues to take place in the terrain of domination, without ever questioning it, although support in assembly-mechanisms.

uncontrolled growth and the danger decay constant does not allow sharing of tasks and prevent serious crystallize a common vision. Thus, the rule is imposed as the lesser of evils, the only possible solution, and the struggles have to compose with the decision makers, or those who represent them. However, the dissolution of the parallel classes and the atomization of individuals is a process that never stops completely. After the inevitable ebb of the mass movements and collective survival may be involved in these problems closer. A small-scale conflict can generate social awareness and community-building awareness.

struggle to escape isolation can federate with other local struggles and maintaining un estado de ánimo adecuado donde cristalice la cuestión social. Dichas luchas surgen lejos de las fábricas pero dentro de la fábrica global en que se ha convertido la sociedad; son por consiguiente necesariamente antidesarrollistas: contra las centrales nucleares, contra los alimentos y cultivos transgénicos, contra el Tren de Alta Velocidad, los parques eólicos, las incineradoras, las líneas de alta tensión, las autopistas, los trasvases y pantanos, las urbanizaciones, los puertos deportivos y los campos de golf, etc.; en resumen, contra toda la maquinaria de guerra del totalitarismo dominante.

He denunciado los seudo movimientos que buscan la integración en el sistema dominante, me he asombrado de the narcissistic idiocy that characterizes the militants and ideologues and have criticized the activism without ideas that consume their energies in fighting epidermal. Do not live under a bourgeois democratic regime but under a totalitarian regime with democratic appearances. In a hidden state of emergency. This distinction is crucial to address the problem of the action. Those who accept the reformist institutions do not practice any work directly for dominance. Nothing from the inside, everything outside. But not enough to an institutional refusal to be violent. The negative position walking in a circle. Consciousness can not be ignored.

said Guicciardini in one of his maxims that "ignorance, having no purpose, no rules or measures, it must be furiously and gives flying blind." Not just what you do not want, you have to know what you want. If you want to build a line of resistance against capitalism unitary social criticism is as necessary as intelligence at the time. Ignorance is counterrevolutionary. The new procedures of oppression such as exclusion, motoring, consumer addiction, suburbanization, etc.., They have operated with few problems thanks to the unions, civic associations, NGOs, political parties, to platforms, experts, ie the intermediaries. Suppression full of them is the best guarantee of success, even in defeat. Moreover, the new company to build can not arise from the ownership of the productive system but dismantled. That means de-urbanization, crafts, peasantry, slowly, drifting, common life, to politics and any major, freedom from want ...

radical change in the way of interacting with nature, change it in the way of life. Potlatch economy, instead of gift exchange. Municipalization soil territorial self. New company to a human scale, based on direct relationships, without mediation, without markets, without state.